Bianca Raby
microcredentials
Back to Blog

Microcredentials, short courses, and the big education letdown

Bianca Raby
November 28, 2025
MicrocredentialsShort CoursesEducation

Do you remember when microcredentials were meant to revolutionise education? Flexible, fast, affordable, and finally a way to upskill without enrolling in a full degree. But now, several years later, we have to ask: what happened?

Hi, I’m Bianca Raby, founder of Oppida, and I’ve built over 200 online short courses. I’ve been watching the microcredentials conversation unfold, and then stall. So let’s unpack what went wrong, in which ways short courses still work in education, and where microcredentials could go next.

What went wrong with microcredentials?

1. Redundancy in higher education

Universities were already offering short courses in the form of grad certs and diplomas. So when microcredentials entered the chat, they didn’t feel new. They were just... smaller. But not always cheaper, easier, or more practical.

2. Lack of depth

Many microcredentials became introductory short courses without a clear next step. No obvious path to mastery, no stackability, no confidence in the education pathway. Learners were left asking, “What’s next?”

3. Inflexible university systems

Here’s the irony: the institutions offering microcredentials often did so with old-school structures—semester start dates, long enrolment forms, and credit-based pricing. That’s not what the short courses market needs. That’s not 21st-century education.

4. Commitment and completion

Self-paced formats + low accountability = low completion. Some learners enrolled in microcredentials with a “quick fix” mindset. Unsurprisingly, many treated them like MOOCs—not serious training.

5. Free online education is winning

Why pay $250 for beginner level short courses when YouTube has a free 10-video playlist from an industry expert?

Microcredentials’ true role

So, are microcredentials useless? Not at all. But they do need a reality check.

In education and professional development, they can still serve two key purposes:

  • CPD compliance: in sectors like health, tech, and education, microcredentials offer a way to tick those boxes without enrolling in a full degree.
  • Niche learning: curious about AI ethics? Corporate sustainability? Well-designed microcredentials can deliver value without the pressure of a full-time program.

But let’s be honest: we already had this. They were just called short courses.

The future of microcredentials in education

What if universities stripped back bloated degrees and made them more practical? What if short courses weren't a one-off but part of a clear, stackable education path to a recognised qualification?

That’s the future of microcredentials I want to see:

  • Program-level assessment
  • Recognition of prior learning (RPL)
  • Real workplace integration
  • Lean, focused education designed for actual outcomes

It’s not about giving up on microcredentials. It’s about using them strategically, not as hype.

What do you think? Have microcredentials had their moment, or are we just getting started?

Until next time, stay awesome, and design smarter.


If you enjoyed this, you might also like…

Instructional Design in 2022 for Teachers: The Microlearning Trend

Beyond the goldfish: AI and the new attention emergency